Cut us some slack
Series: Building ; 266(8193) 13 July 2001, 54(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s):- TIME LIMITS
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- JOHN MOWLEM CONSTRUCTION PLC V SOS DEFENCE
- HOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
- BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
- CONTRACTORS
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS64259 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 113971-1001 |
Notes that adjudication is increasingly required to deal with complicated matters that are difficult to resolve within 28 days. Suggests that it would make for a fairer process if adjudicators were given the right to extend the time limit. With reference to the recent case of "John Mowlem Construction plc v SoS for Defence" (2000).