Image from Google Jackets

Don't leave it to a judge to define your responsibility

By: Series: Construction News ; (6726) 26 July 2001, 25(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: With reference to case law explains how project managers must define as clearly as possible, in their terms of engagement, precisely what their obligations to their clients are. Discusses cases "Pride Valley Foods v Hall & Partners"; "Pozzolanic Lytag v Bryan Hobson Associates"(1999); "Chesham Properties Ltd v Bucknall Austin Project Management Services Ltd"(1996) and "Copthorne Hotel (Newcastle) v Arup Associates"(1999).
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article ABS64300 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 113973-1001

With reference to case law explains how project managers must define as clearly as possible, in their terms of engagement, precisely what their obligations to their clients are. Discusses cases "Pride Valley Foods v Hall & Partners"; "Pozzolanic Lytag v Bryan Hobson Associates"(1999); "Chesham Properties Ltd v Bucknall Austin Project Management Services Ltd"(1996) and "Copthorne Hotel (Newcastle) v Arup Associates"(1999).