Nothing but the truth
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0131) 4 August 2001, 99(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Considers the decision in "Banks v Cox" which highlights the distinction between caveat emptor and misrepresentation. The defendants were found guilty of fraud because they did not respond honestly to a conveyancing enquiry regarding the financial viability of their business.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3731-36 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 114044-1001 |
Considers the decision in "Banks v Cox" which highlights the distinction between caveat emptor and misrepresentation. The defendants were found guilty of fraud because they did not respond honestly to a conveyancing enquiry regarding the financial viability of their business.