Image from Google Jackets

Adjudicator's failure to deal with the issues

By: Series: Contract Journal ; 409(6337) 25 July 2001, 18(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Considers the issue of whether a failure to decide matters put before the adjudicator may render the decision unenforceable. Examines the case of "Ballast Plc v The Burrell Company (Construction Management) Limited", Outer House Court of Session, 21 June 2001 where the adjudicator considered that the problems raised over the informality of the bespoke form of contract rendered the dispute incapable of being decided by adjudication. The implication is that adjudicators must decide the matters referred to them otherwise their decision my be rendered unenforceable.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article ABS64363 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 114087-1001

Considers the issue of whether a failure to decide matters put before the adjudicator may render the decision unenforceable. Examines the case of "Ballast Plc v The Burrell Company (Construction Management) Limited", Outer House Court of Session, 21 June 2001 where the adjudicator considered that the problems raised over the informality of the bespoke form of contract rendered the dispute incapable of being decided by adjudication. The implication is that adjudicators must decide the matters referred to them otherwise their decision my be rendered unenforceable.