Landlord and tenant: assured shorthold tenancy
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2001] 31 EG 100 (CS) (4/8/01)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: "Yenula Properties Ltd v Naidu", ChD 18 July 2001. The defendant tenant (N) disputed the tenancy as an assured shorthold tenancy and claimed he became a tenant before the claimant (Y) served a notice under the Housing Act 1988 s20. Y appealed after failing to obtain a county court declaration that the tenancy was a shorthold tenancy. The appeal was allowed on the grounds that a s20 notice had been correctly served before 4 August 1995 and allowing N access to the flat before 4 August did not indicate he had moved in as a tenant.| Item type | Current library | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London News article | 1 | Available | 114106-1001 |
"Yenula Properties Ltd v Naidu", ChD 18 July 2001. The defendant tenant (N) disputed the tenancy as an assured shorthold tenancy and claimed he became a tenant before the claimant (Y) served a notice under the Housing Act 1988 s20. Y appealed after failing to obtain a county court declaration that the tenancy was a shorthold tenancy. The appeal was allowed on the grounds that a s20 notice had been correctly served before 4 August 1995 and allowing N access to the flat before 4 August did not indicate he had moved in as a tenant.