McDonald's Property Co Ltd v HSBC Bank plc
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2001] 36 EG, 181-186(6)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: ChD 25 April 2001. Tenant (A) held a lease from landlord (B) at a rent subject to review, on the condition written notice was given within a specified period. It also provided a timetable for the determination of the rent. Notice triggering the first rent review was given late. A challenged the review contending that time was of the essenceand that, as it had been served late, the notice was not valid. A issued a Pt 8 claim, also contending there were compelling contra-indications. B issued an application to strike out A's claim. "Held": the claim and the appeal were dismissed. B's application was dismissed but A was ordered to pay the costs of the application. Time was not of the essence for the triggering of the rent review.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS64571 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 114624-1001 |
ChD 25 April 2001. Tenant (A) held a lease from landlord (B) at a rent subject to review, on the condition written notice was given within a specified period. It also provided a timetable for the determination of the rent. Notice triggering the first rent review was given late. A challenged the review contending that time was of the essenceand that, as it had been served late, the notice was not valid. A issued a Pt 8 claim, also contending there were compelling contra-indications. B issued an application to strike out A's claim. "Held": the claim and the appeal were dismissed. B's application was dismissed but A was ordered to pay the costs of the application. Time was not of the essence for the triggering of the rent review.