Restricted data
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0137) 15 September 2001, 152(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the recent CA decision in "Daejan Properties Ltd v London LVT"(WB3729-19). This considered whether the wording of the new s19(2A) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 allows an LVT to consider service charge payments already paid by the tenant or whether jurisdiction is confined to those cases in which the disputed sum remains unpaid. CA differed from the trial judge by deciding the LVT did not have jurisdiction to deal with the case.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3735-16 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 114658-1001 |
Discusses the recent CA decision in "Daejan Properties Ltd v London LVT"(WB3729-19). This considered whether the wording of the new s19(2A) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 allows an LVT to consider service charge payments already paid by the tenant or whether jurisdiction is confined to those cases in which the disputed sum remains unpaid. CA differed from the trial judge by deciding the LVT did not have jurisdiction to deal with the case.