Godfrey v Conway CBC

Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; {2001] JPL 1162-1168(7)Publication details: 2001Subject(s):

Summary: QBD 13 November 2000. Statutory nuisance. Abatement notice alleging noise nuisance. Whether noise amounted to a stattuory nuisance. Whether requirement to 'abate' the nuisance and 'prevent recurrence' rendered the notice invalid. Appeals against notice dismissed. (Taken from journal headnote)

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	X114828 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	114828-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	X114655 Copyright and the 'idea/expression dichotomy"	X1147 Getting the job done	X1148 Habitability laws for rental housing: the impact of tenant inputs	X114828 Godfrey v Conway CBC	X114830 Copas v Windsor and Maidenhead BC	X114834. Basildon DC v SoS Environment	X114835 R on the application of Torridge DC and SoS Environment and Great Torrington Town Lands and Poor Charity	Next

QBD 13 November 2000. Statutory nuisance. Abatement notice alleging noise nuisance. Whether noise amounted to a stattuory nuisance. Whether requirement to 'abate' the nuisance and 'prevent recurrence' rendered the notice invalid. Appeals against notice dismissed. (Taken from journal headnote)

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)