Image from Google Jackets

Name borrowing arbitration

By: Series: Contract Journal ; 410(6345) 19 September 2001, 23(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: Discusses "Belgravia Property Company Ltd v S & R (London) Ltd and Taylor Woodrow Management Ltd". This highlights the mechanisms for works contractors' name-borrowing arbitrations with the employer under JCT Management Forms of Contract. Examines clauses 4.27 and 1.11. The implication of the judge's ruling, in this case, is that an aggrieved works contractor should only proceed in an arbitration against the employer to recover disputed monies if he has first complied with the requirements of clause 1.11, and informed the management contractor of his intentions. Full copy of judgment available at: http://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/4D7B3A696F20153F80256A9200541626?OpenDocument
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article ABS64528 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 114852-1001

Discusses "Belgravia Property Company Ltd v S & R (London) Ltd and Taylor Woodrow Management Ltd". This highlights the mechanisms for works contractors' name-borrowing arbitrations with the employer under JCT Management Forms of Contract. Examines clauses 4.27 and 1.11. The implication of the judge's ruling, in this case, is that an aggrieved works contractor should only proceed in an arbitration against the employer to recover disputed monies if he has first complied with the requirements of clause 1.11, and informed the management contractor of his intentions. Full copy of judgment available at: http://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/4D7B3A696F20153F80256A9200541626?OpenDocument