Inconsistencies in revised PPG17 on sport
Series: Planning (for the Natural and Built Environment) ; (1438) 28 September 2001, 22(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Details the main responses of the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) to the draft revision of PPG 17: "Sport, open space and recreation". Overall the RTPI welcomes the consultation on the draft, which it feels rightly stresses the importance of locating facilities on sites that are accessible other than by car. However, it is also critical of a number of aspects of the draft revision. For instance, it feels that the draft PPG needs to be more consistent in referring to formal and informal facilities, which range tremendously in scale and importance. The RTPI's full response can be obtained from: Phillippa Millbrook, Public Affairs. Email: [email protected]| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS64589 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 114948-1001 |
Details the main responses of the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) to the draft revision of PPG 17: "Sport, open space and recreation". Overall the RTPI welcomes the consultation on the draft, which it feels rightly stresses the importance of locating facilities on sites that are accessible other than by car. However, it is also critical of a number of aspects of the draft revision. For instance, it feels that the draft PPG needs to be more consistent in referring to formal and informal facilities, which range tremendously in scale and importance. The RTPI's full response can be obtained from: Phillippa Millbrook, Public Affairs. Email: [email protected]