And now wash your hands
Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; October 2001, 1144-1152(9)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: Discusses the implications of "Birmingham CC v Oakley" HL 2000, which found that a risk which arose by reason of an undesirable arrangement of rooms (i.e. a lavatory without a wash basin) could not be classed as a statutory nuisance. Considers the substantive issue before HL , and the majority and dissenting judgments, and the likely impact of the Human Rights Act. Notes that HL's judgment highlights the difficulties posed for both local authorities qua landlords and their tenants by the ongoing residualisation of public sector housing stock. Full copy of judgeent available on http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldjudgmt/jd001129/birmin-1.htm| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS64541 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 115009-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses the implications of "Birmingham CC v Oakley" HL 2000, which found that a risk which arose by reason of an undesirable arrangement of rooms (i.e. a lavatory without a wash basin) could not be classed as a statutory nuisance. Considers the substantive issue before HL , and the majority and dissenting judgments, and the likely impact of the Human Rights Act. Notes that HL's judgment highlights the difficulties posed for both local authorities qua landlords and their tenants by the ongoing residualisation of public sector housing stock. Full copy of judgeent available on http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldjudgmt/jd001129/birmin-1.htm