Rent review
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1994) EGCS 44(1) (19/3/94)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: "Arnold and others v National Westminster Bank plc" CA 9 March 1994. Tenants` appeal dismissed, CA upheld a judgment that their original application to challenge a rent review decision based on an error of law, was excessively delayed and could not call upon any special provision for remission.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3012-27 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 10785-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3011-31 Consequential damage | WB3011-32 Enforcing covenants | WB3011-35 Rent review | WB3012-27 Rent review | WB3012-32 Architects | WB3012-33 Negligence: duty of care and liability | WB3012-34 Valuer`s negligence |
"Arnold and others v National Westminster Bank plc" CA 9 March 1994. Tenants` appeal dismissed, CA upheld a judgment that their original application to challenge a rent review decision based on an error of law, was excessively delayed and could not call upon any special provision for remission.