Plaintiff can choose best remedy
Language: English Series: Times ; 26 July 1994 (1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: In "Arbuthnott and others v Fagan and Feltrim Underwriting Agencies Ltd and others", "Deeny and others v Gooda Walkers Ltd and others" and "Henderson and others v Merrett Sundicates Ltd and others", HL 25 July 1994, it was held that a plaintiff who had available to him concurrent remedies in contract and tort could choose the remedy whichappeared to him to be the most advantageous unless his contract precluded him from doing so.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3028-61 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 10789-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In "Arbuthnott and others v Fagan and Feltrim Underwriting Agencies Ltd and others", "Deeny and others v Gooda Walkers Ltd and others" and "Henderson and others v Merrett Sundicates Ltd and others", HL 25 July 1994, it was held that a plaintiff who had available to him concurrent remedies in contract and tort could choose the remedy whichappeared to him to be the most advantageous unless his contract precluded him from doing so.