Image from Google Jackets

Watch the small print

By: Series: Building ; 266(8206) 19 October 2001, 56-57(2)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Highlights the relevance of a footnote in JCT 98 which states that a dispute that escalates into arbitration or litigation should be treated as if no adjudication took place. This statement is examined with reference to the case, "City Inn Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd" which found that the footnote in JCT 98 was a correct statement of the law and the adjudicator's decision does not affect the burden of proof in any legal action that may follow.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article ABS64656 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 115353-1001

Highlights the relevance of a footnote in JCT 98 which states that a dispute that escalates into arbitration or litigation should be treated as if no adjudication took place. This statement is examined with reference to the case, "City Inn Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd" which found that the footnote in JCT 98 was a correct statement of the law and the adjudicator's decision does not affect the burden of proof in any legal action that may follow.