Introductory tenancies
Series: DTLR News Release ; (456) 24 October 2001, (2)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: The Appeal Court has ruled government's Introductory Tenancy (IT) regime for new tenants is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The judgment involved two cases "McLellan v Bracknell Forest DC" (2001) and Reigate and Banstead BC v Benfield and Forrest"(2001). The Department was joined as an interested party in both cases. The full transcript of the CA judgment is available via the Court Service website at http://ww.courtservice.gov.uk/judgments/judg_home.htm Guidance for local authorities on Introductory Tenancies is given in DOE Circular 2/97. The Local Authority Associations' good practice guidance on the running of an IT regime is available at http://www.lga.gov.uk/lga/socialaffairs/housing index.htm#Housing| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3741-18 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 115411-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
The Appeal Court has ruled government's Introductory Tenancy (IT) regime for new tenants is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The judgment involved two cases "McLellan v Bracknell Forest DC" (2001) and Reigate and Banstead BC v Benfield and Forrest"(2001). The Department was joined as an interested party in both cases. The full transcript of the CA judgment is available via the Court Service website at http://ww.courtservice.gov.uk/judgments/judg_home.htm Guidance for local authorities on Introductory Tenancies is given in DOE Circular 2/97. The Local Authority Associations' good practice guidance on the running of an IT regime is available at http://www.lga.gov.uk/lga/socialaffairs/housing index.htm#Housing