Ruling ripples
Series: HouseBuilder ; (60 no.11) December 2001, 27(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Examines the implications of a recent ruling at the high court. In R (on the application of JA Pye and Others) v Oxford City Council which revised the policy on supplementary planning guidance (SPG). This case was a challenge against the adoption of SPG and it failed but the case has important implications for future policy.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS64941 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 116089-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Examines the implications of a recent ruling at the high court. In R (on the application of JA Pye and Others) v Oxford City Council which revised the policy on supplementary planning guidance (SPG). This case was a challenge against the adoption of SPG and it failed but the case has important implications for future policy.