Bland v Ingram's Estates Ltd and others (No2)
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2001] 50 EG 92-99(8)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: CA 11 July 2001. The appellant (B) was granted relief from forfeiture at an earlier CA hearing on 30 December 200 (See Abs64167) subject to Mr and Mrs B (M) applying for relief. B was required to pay respondent (U) a sum equal to the aggregate of unpaid rent of £23,000 (accuring to 29 April 1996 - the dat e of the lease) granted to U, plus interest until payment and the costs of effecting entry. Although B and M were required to pay rent after 29 April 1996, the landlord was required to give credit for the rent paid to it after entry and the costs of effecting entry and therefor after that date. B was required to pay certain legal costs with allowance to relect the fact that relief should have been given in the county court instead of the high court.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS64919 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 116228-1001 |
CA 11 July 2001. The appellant (B) was granted relief from forfeiture at an earlier CA hearing on 30 December 200 (See Abs64167) subject to Mr and Mrs B (M) applying for relief. B was required to pay respondent (U) a sum equal to the aggregate of unpaid rent of £23,000 (accuring to 29 April 1996 - the dat e of the lease) granted to U, plus interest until payment and the costs of effecting entry. Although B and M were required to pay rent after 29 April 1996, the landlord was required to give credit for the rent paid to it after entry and the costs of effecting entry and therefor after that date. B was required to pay certain legal costs with allowance to relect the fact that relief should have been given in the county court instead of the high court.