Avoiding payment of an adjudicator's decision
Series: New Law Journal ; 151(7011) 7 December 2001, 1821-1822(2)Publication details: 2001Subject(s):- VHE CONSTRUCTION PLC V RBSTB TRUST CO LTD
- MCLEAN CONTRACTORS V SWANSEA HOUSING ASSOCIATION
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
- CONTRACT DISPUTES
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS65018 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 116546-1001 |
Discusses the issue of paying parties in arbitration cases trying to avoid the enforcement of the adjudicator's decision, with particular reference to the cases "VHE Construction v RBSTB Trust" and "McLean Contractors v Swansea Housing Association" which gave conflicting judgments on this issue. Concludes that the differences can be reconciled by viewing the role of the adjudicator; in the VHE case he acts more as a arbitrator or a judge while in McLeans he is more a contract administrator.