Geoff Brewer of Brewer Consulting considers adjudicators' fees
Series: Contract Journal ; 412(6361) 23 January 2002, 21(1)Publication details: 2002Subject(s):- ARBITRATION ACT 1996
- HOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
- STUBBS RICH ARCHITECTS V W.H.TOLLEY & SON
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS65117 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 116833-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers whether an adjudicator is entitled to retain his decision until his fees have been paid, and also examines how much he should be paid. Reference is made to Construction Act 1996 provisions. Concludes that a recent decision in " Stubbs Rich Architects v W.H.Tolley " indicates that fees charged by adjudicators may be challenged if, and only if, the adjudicator has acted in bad faith.