Southwark LBC v McIntosh
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2001] 08 EG 164-169(6)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: ChD 9 November 2001. Tenant (M) had originally claimed damages for breach of landlords' covenant to repair, as implied by Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s11, as a result of dampness. CC had held landlord (S) liable. On appeal certain issues were raised such as whether M was warned not to use a cupboard inappropriately, whether the damp or a leak through M's kitchen ceiling was caused by a breach of covenant by S, and the measure of damages. It was found that S was not liable for the dampness.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS65160 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 116966-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| ABS65157 New York | ABS65158 Property France Paris | ABS65159 Buying time to negotiate | ABS65160 Southwark LBC v McIntosh | ABS65161 Alienation provisions | ABS65162 Recession | ABS65163 Hazel v Akhtar and another |
ChD 9 November 2001. Tenant (M) had originally claimed damages for breach of landlords' covenant to repair, as implied by Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s11, as a result of dampness. CC had held landlord (S) liable. On appeal certain issues were raised such as whether M was warned not to use a cupboard inappropriately, whether the damp or a leak through M's kitchen ceiling was caused by a breach of covenant by S, and the measure of damages. It was found that S was not liable for the dampness.