Adjudicator's decision held despite errors
Series: Construction News ; (6755) 28 February 2002, 12(1)Publication details: 2002Subject(s):- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- BOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD
- JCT STANDARD FORM OF BUILDING CONTRACT 1998
- C & B SCENE CONCEPT DESIGN LTD V ISOBARS LTD
- SHERWOOD AND CASSON LTD V MACKENZIE ENGINEERING LTD
- NORTHERN DEVELOPMENTS (CUMBRIA) LTD V J & J NICHOL
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS65130 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 117064-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Examines how recent cases, "Bouygues v Dahl-Jensen" and "C & B Scene Concept Design v Isobars"have questioned the extent of an adjudicator's jurisdiction. Highlights that the parts of adjudicator's decision which are within jurisdiction will ordinarily be enforced, and that he has to decide,as a matter of law, the extent of the matters referred to him. Adds that the existence of a construction contract is a matter for the courts.