All or nothing
Series: Building ; 267 (8214) 1 March 2002, 50(1)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: Examines a recent court ruling, Shimiz Europe Ltd v Automajor Ltd. Plaintiff challenged the adjudicator's decision on the grounds that he ordered payment in areas where he had no jurisdiction. The court disagreed and also revealed a reluctance for the 'unpicking and re-sewing' of the adjudicator's decision. Concludes that the decision of an adjudicator must be challenged in its entirety or not at all.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book | London Books | ABS65173 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 117109-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Books Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Examines a recent court ruling, Shimiz Europe Ltd v Automajor Ltd. Plaintiff challenged the adjudicator's decision on the grounds that he ordered payment in areas where he had no jurisdiction. The court disagreed and also revealed a reluctance for the 'unpicking and re-sewing' of the adjudicator's decision. Concludes that the decision of an adjudicator must be challenged in its entirety or not at all.