Landlord and tenant
Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [2002] 11 EG 155 (CS)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: "R (on the application of Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee", CA 7 March 2002. Appellant tenant (M) was served a notice proposing a statutory tenancy and a later notice proposing an assured tenancy by the respondent landlord. M objected to the rent under the assured tenancy and claimed the landlord could not determine the rent because his tenancy was still governed by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. M also contended that the later notice was invalid by virtue of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 s10. The respondent determined the rent payable on the basis that the first notice was invalid as it had not been given to the tenant and the second notice was valid. The determination was upheld. M appealed. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London News article | WB3811-25 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 117154-1001 |
"R (on the application of Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee", CA 7 March 2002. Appellant tenant (M) was served a notice proposing a statutory tenancy and a later notice proposing an assured tenancy by the respondent landlord. M objected to the rent under the assured tenancy and claimed the landlord could not determine the rent because his tenancy was still governed by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. M also contended that the later notice was invalid by virtue of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 s10. The respondent determined the rent payable on the basis that the first notice was invalid as it had not been given to the tenant and the second notice was valid. The determination was upheld. M appealed. Appeal dismissed.