Ullah v Leicester CC
Language: English Series: Rating & Valuation Reporter ; (1996) 36 RVR 6-11(6)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: LT 5 July 1995. Held that a two-storey brick building with a pitched timber and slate roof at the rear of a dwelling house should be valued for compulsory purchase purposes on the assumption that it had an established use for light industrial purposes because that use had not been abandoned since although occupation of the property ceased two years before the valuation date it was due to the actions of the council and the uncertainty created by the compulsory purchase order.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS54526 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 10968-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
LT 5 July 1995. Held that a two-storey brick building with a pitched timber and slate roof at the rear of a dwelling house should be valued for compulsory purchase purposes on the assumption that it had an established use for light industrial purposes because that use had not been abandoned since although occupation of the property ceased two years before the valuation date it was due to the actions of the council and the uncertainty created by the compulsory purchase order.