Image from Google Jackets

Rentcharge

Series: Estates Gazette ; [2002] 15 EG 132 (CS) (6/4/02)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: "Orchard Trading Estate Management Ltd v Johnson Security Ltd", CA 26 March 2002. Respondent (J) owned and managed the common part of an industrial estate in Toddington, Gloucestershire. Appellant (O) was the freehold owner of one of the units of the estate. J was entitled to recover from the freeholder rates and service expenditure, but by virtue of the Rentcharges Act 1977 S2(3)(c) estate rentcharges were an exception to the prohibition on the creation of new rentcharges. J tried to recover certain sums under the rentcharge, O contended it was void because it failed to comply with S2(4)(b) 2(5) of the 1977 act. CA upheld hc's decision that S2(4)(6) and 2(5) had been satisfied, appeal dismissed. Full copy of judgement available on http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=1103&searchTerm=Orchard+Trading+Estate+Management&ascending=false&index=1&maxIndex=134.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London News article WB3814-19 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 117559-1001

"Orchard Trading Estate Management Ltd v Johnson Security Ltd", CA 26 March 2002. Respondent (J) owned and managed the common part of an industrial estate in Toddington, Gloucestershire. Appellant (O) was the freehold owner of one of the units of the estate. J was entitled to recover from the freeholder rates and service expenditure, but by virtue of the Rentcharges Act 1977 S2(3)(c) estate rentcharges were an exception to the prohibition on the creation of new rentcharges. J tried to recover certain sums under the rentcharge, O contended it was void because it failed to comply with S2(4)(b) 2(5) of the 1977 act. CA upheld hc's decision that S2(4)(6) and 2(5) had been satisfied, appeal dismissed. Full copy of judgement available on http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=1103&searchTerm=Orchard+Trading+Estate+Management&ascending=false&index=1&maxIndex=134.