Misguided notions
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0214) 6 April 2002, 120-121(2)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: Argues that responses to the planning green paper have ignored several important proposals that should have received more publicity. One major area of concern is the lack of adequate resources. Argues that if this was addressed, there would be immediate improvements in all areas of the planning system. Discusses the viability of a number of proposals including the certificate to replace outline permission, the three year implementation period, the abolition of twin-tracking, delivery contracts, unified applications and the three month appeal period. Concludes that while the planning green paper contains some positive ideas, many of the reforms could cause confusion and delay.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS65424 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 117563-1001 |
Argues that responses to the planning green paper have ignored several important proposals that should have received more publicity. One major area of concern is the lack of adequate resources. Argues that if this was addressed, there would be immediate improvements in all areas of the planning system. Discusses the viability of a number of proposals including the certificate to replace outline permission, the three year implementation period, the abolition of twin-tracking, delivery contracts, unified applications and the three month appeal period. Concludes that while the planning green paper contains some positive ideas, many of the reforms could cause confusion and delay.