Rent review

Series: Estates Gazette ; [2002] 18 EG 152 (CS) (4/5/02)Publication details: 2002Subject(s):

Summary: "Barclays Bank plc v Saville Estates Ltd" CA 19 April 2002. An appeal by tenant (B) over a rent review dispute, implying that it was necessary for a landlord to apply to the RICS within a reasonable time in order to give business efficacy to the lease, was allowed. The rent review clause in the lease did not impose an express time limit.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
News article	London News article	WB3817-12 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	117907-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	WB3817-09 House prices rise by 10.23%	WB3817-10 Tenants' voice to be heard	WB3817-11 Assign of the times	WB3817-12 Rent review	WB3817-13 DTLR report calls for mixed use focus	WB3817-14 Planning - bring it online	WB3817-15 RTPI calls for green belt planning relaxation	Next

"Barclays Bank plc v Saville Estates Ltd" CA 19 April 2002. An appeal by tenant (B) over a rent review dispute, implying that it was necessary for a landlord to apply to the RICS within a reasonable time in order to give business efficacy to the lease, was allowed. The rent review clause in the lease did not impose an express time limit.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)