Image from Google Jackets

Business lease renewal

Series: Estates Gazette ; [2002] 19 EG (CS) 11/5/02Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: "J Murphy & Sons Ltd v Railtrack plc" CA, 29 April 2002. When assessing the open market rent for a new tenancy under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II on premises which were landlocked and only accessible through land owned tenant (J), the HC held that only 60% of the rent should be charged. The appellant landlord's (R) appeal that the lack of access should be disregarded was dismissed.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London News article WB3818-20 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 117980-1001

"J Murphy & Sons Ltd v Railtrack plc" CA, 29 April 2002. When assessing the open market rent for a new tenancy under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II on premises which were landlocked and only accessible through land owned tenant (J), the HC held that only 60% of the rent should be charged. The appellant landlord's (R) appeal that the lack of access should be disregarded was dismissed.