Expert determination: challenging an expert determination
Series: Arbitration Law Monthly ; 2(5) May 2002, 7-11(5)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: Expert determination is often used to resolve valuation disputes. It is usual that an expert determination is capable of challenge in the courts in only two circumstances: the an expert has reached a conclusion that is so unreasonable that no reasonable expert could have reached that conclusion; or the expert has ignored his instructions in a material respect in reaching his decision. Examines these aspects of expert determination in two decisions of Thomas J, "Galaxy Energy International Ltd v Eurobunker SpA" (2001) and "Invensys plc v Automotive Sealing Systems Ltd" (2001) and a decision of the CA, "Veba Oil Supply and Trading GmbH v Petrotrade Inc" (2001)| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS65598 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 118500-1001 |
Expert determination is often used to resolve valuation disputes. It is usual that an expert determination is capable of challenge in the courts in only two circumstances: the an expert has reached a conclusion that is so unreasonable that no reasonable expert could have reached that conclusion; or the expert has ignored his instructions in a material respect in reaching his decision. Examines these aspects of expert determination in two decisions of Thomas J, "Galaxy Energy International Ltd v Eurobunker SpA" (2001) and "Invensys plc v Automotive Sealing Systems Ltd" (2001) and a decision of the CA, "Veba Oil Supply and Trading GmbH v Petrotrade Inc" (2001)