Image from Google Jackets

South Bucks DC v Porter and another; Chichester DC v Searle and others; Wrexham CBC v Berry; Hertsmere BC v Harty and others

Series: Weekly Law Reports ; [2002] 1 WLR 1359-1383(24)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: Four cases in which the defendant gypsies appealed against injunctions granted to local planning authorities under the Town and Country Planning Act s187B to restrain a breach of planning control. The gypsies were living in mobile homes on land that they occupied in breach of planning control. They argued that the courts granting the injunctions failed to consider, as well as relevant planning considerations, the probably effect of the order on their human rights under the Human Rights Act 1998 s6(1) and the Convention. "Held" the first three appeals were allowed but the fourth was dismissed. Full copy of judgement available on Court Service website http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=124&searchTerm=South+Buckinghamshire&ascending=false&index=18&maxIndex=53.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS65647 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 118520-1001

Four cases in which the defendant gypsies appealed against injunctions granted to local planning authorities under the Town and Country Planning Act s187B to restrain a breach of planning control. The gypsies were living in mobile homes on land that they occupied in breach of planning control. They argued that the courts granting the injunctions failed to consider, as well as relevant planning considerations, the probably effect of the order on their human rights under the Human Rights Act 1998 s6(1) and the Convention. "Held" the first three appeals were allowed but the fourth was dismissed. Full copy of judgement available on Court Service website http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=124&searchTerm=South+Buckinghamshire&ascending=false&index=18&maxIndex=53.

Previous
Back to results
Next
Close