Image from Google Jackets

Omar v El-Wakil

Series: Property, Planning and Compensation Reports ; [2002] 1 P&CR 36-50(15)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: CA 11 July 2001. Real property. vendor and purchaser. Contract for sale of land. Neither vendor or purchaser able to complete. Whether deposit paid. Whether purchaser entitled to return of deposit as of right. Whether court should exercise its descretion to order return of deposit under Law of Property Act 1925 s48(2). Approach to exercise of court's discretion under s49(2). [Taken from journal abstract].
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article X118551 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 118551-1001

CA 11 July 2001. Real property. vendor and purchaser. Contract for sale of land. Neither vendor or purchaser able to complete. Whether deposit paid. Whether purchaser entitled to return of deposit as of right. Whether court should exercise its descretion to order return of deposit under Law of Property Act 1925 s48(2). Approach to exercise of court's discretion under s49(2). [Taken from journal abstract].