There is no substitute for proof
Series: Civil Engineering Surveyor ; August 2002, 23(1)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: The principle that if a legal right is infringed, resulting in financial loss, the right of recovery depends on an ability to prove that what is being alleged has occurred. This is highly relevant to contractors who submit claims and the 1991 case "Wharf Properties Ltd v Eric Cumine Associates" clarified this issue. The judge detailed the kind of conditions behind the success or failure of global claims.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS65807 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 119568-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
The principle that if a legal right is infringed, resulting in financial loss, the right of recovery depends on an ability to prove that what is being alleged has occurred. This is highly relevant to contractors who submit claims and the 1991 case "Wharf Properties Ltd v Eric Cumine Associates" clarified this issue. The judge detailed the kind of conditions behind the success or failure of global claims.