Examines challenges to adjudication by referral to arbitration
Series: Contract Journal ; 414(6389) 7 August 2002, 2(1)Publication details: 2002Subject(s):- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- J T MACKLEY & CO LTD V GOSPORT MARINA LTD
- ICE FORMS
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS65928 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 119834-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Reviews an adjudicator's decision by arbitration, in the recent case of "J T Mackley and Co Ltd v Gosport Marina Ltd" [2002]. The implication is that where parties seek to challenge an adjudicator's decision by referring the matter to arbitration under an ICE form, it will first be necessary to obtain an Engineer's Clause 66 decision in respect of the same matters. (Taken from article headnote)