Validity offers no criminal defence
Language: English Series: Times ; 19 April 1995, 38(1)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: In "R v Wicks", CA 10 April 1995, it was held that the decision to issue an enforcement notice could not be challenged on the grounds of irrelevant matters, perversity and bad faith by way of defence to an indictment alleging an offence contrary to Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s179(1).| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3116-100 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 11209-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3115-48 Architects | WB3115-49 Reasonable notice required | WB3115-50 Rebutting presumption of advancement | WB3116-100 Validity offers no criminal defence | WB3116-112 Financing agreement | WB3116-113 Negligence | WB3116-114 Surveyors negligence |
In "R v Wicks", CA 10 April 1995, it was held that the decision to issue an enforcement notice could not be challenged on the grounds of irrelevant matters, perversity and bad faith by way of defence to an indictment alleging an offence contrary to Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s179(1).