Knockout argument

By:

Bingham, T

Series: Building ; 267(8249) 6 September 2002, 48-49(2)Publication details: 2002Subject(s):

Summary: Discusses the circumstances in which litigation is a cheaper and quicker dispute resolution option than arbitration. Cites "Gibson v Imperial Homes" as a case in point.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS65933 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	120030-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS65930 Considers adjudicators answering jurisdiction questions	ABS65931 A guiding light	ABS65932 We shall not be moved	ABS65933 Knockout argument	ABS65934 No more surprised parties	ABS65935 A tragic obsession	ABS65936 This really works...	Next

Discusses the circumstances in which litigation is a cheaper and quicker dispute resolution option than arbitration. Cites "Gibson v Imperial Homes" as a case in point.

Back to results

1 Difficult sums
by Bingham, T
2 Claims for offsite overheads in event of delay
by Brewer, G

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)