What's the damage?
Series: Building ; 267(8246) 9 August 2002, 43(1)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the difficulty of assessing damages owed on quantity surveyors' negligent cost underestimation. These damages should follow the basic rules of damages, namely that the employer should be entitled to all reasonably foreseeable losses caused by the negligence. Details matters which could reduce the loss amount to be recovered from the negligent quantity surveyor.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS65977 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 120034-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| ABS65974 No future for zones | ABS65975 Don't be wise after the event | ABS65976 The top 200 | ABS65977 What's the damage? | ABS65978 Partnering | ABS65979 To the rescue | ABS65980 Not 'adverse' possession |
Discusses the difficulty of assessing damages owed on quantity surveyors' negligent cost underestimation. These damages should follow the basic rules of damages, namely that the employer should be entitled to all reasonably foreseeable losses caused by the negligence. Details matters which could reduce the loss amount to be recovered from the negligent quantity surveyor.