Paying for a breach of contract
Series: Construction News ; (6785) 26 September 2002, 27(1)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: Discusses a recent case that shows non-payment can be considered grounds for a party to treat a contract as ended. However a recent case "Stocznia Gdanska SA v Latvian Shipping Co & Others " (2002) shows that the timing of payment must be a condition of the contract.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS66005 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 120212-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses a recent case that shows non-payment can be considered grounds for a party to treat a contract as ended. However a recent case "Stocznia Gdanska SA v Latvian Shipping Co & Others " (2002) shows that the timing of payment must be a condition of the contract.