A multi-attribute utility model for dispute resolution strategy selection
Series: Construction Management and Economics ; 20(7) October 2002, 557-568(12)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: Considers the systematic determination of which dispute resolution strategy to adopt for a given dispute and the paucity of research in this field. Examines a decision-making model using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-attribute utility technique (MAUT). The model comprises four parts: selection criteria, dispute resolution strategies, collection of utility factors and selection criteria weightings. The model was developed from data collected from experts using an interview survey and is tested using a hypothetical scenario and case studies. Tables and references [Taken from journal abstract].| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS66243 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 120932-1001 |
Considers the systematic determination of which dispute resolution strategy to adopt for a given dispute and the paucity of research in this field. Examines a decision-making model using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-attribute utility technique (MAUT). The model comprises four parts: selection criteria, dispute resolution strategies, collection of utility factors and selection criteria weightings. The model was developed from data collected from experts using an interview survey and is tested using a hypothetical scenario and case studies. Tables and references [Taken from journal abstract].