Measure of damages
Series: Contract Journal ; 416(6408) 8 January 2003, 19(1)Publication details: 2003Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the issue of measure of damages for breach of contract where the cost of reinstatement is disproportionate to the loss suffered. Examines the case "McLaren Murdoch and Hamilton v Abercromby Motor Group Ltd"(CSOH [2003] CILL 1964) with reference to "Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth" (HL Abs53197) which helped to clarify how damages should be assessed for defective performance under a construction contract. View "McLaren Murdoch and Hamilton v Abercromby Motor Group Ltd" judgment at ww.scotcourts.gov.uk.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS66312 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 121222-1001 |
Discusses the issue of measure of damages for breach of contract where the cost of reinstatement is disproportionate to the loss suffered. Examines the case "McLaren Murdoch and Hamilton v Abercromby Motor Group Ltd"(CSOH [2003] CILL 1964) with reference to "Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth" (HL Abs53197) which helped to clarify how damages should be assessed for defective performance under a construction contract. View "McLaren Murdoch and Hamilton v Abercromby Motor Group Ltd" judgment at ww.scotcourts.gov.uk.