Few winners in the Homebase crusade
Series: Property Week ; 68(3) 24 January 2003, 34-35(2)Publication details: 2003Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the case "Homebase Ltd and another v Allied Dunbar Assurance plc" (CA Abs65740) over a disputed subletting. Homebase was proved unsuccessful in its attempt to prove that Allied Dunbar had unreasonably withheld consent to the subletting of a retail warehouse in Wolverhampton. The author states that the case reinforced the notion that lease terms rule.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS66448 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 121578-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses the case "Homebase Ltd and another v Allied Dunbar Assurance plc" (CA Abs65740) over a disputed subletting. Homebase was proved unsuccessful in its attempt to prove that Allied Dunbar had unreasonably withheld consent to the subletting of a retail warehouse in Wolverhampton. The author states that the case reinforced the notion that lease terms rule.