Image from Google Jackets

Alderney Estates Ltd v SoS Transport and another

Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [2003] 10 EG 163 (CS) | Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; [2003] JPL 744-753(8)Publication details: 2003Subject(s): Summary: CA, 21 February 2003. Appeal by the SoS against the judge's decision to overturn the SoS's refusal of planning permission for a residential development on a greenfield site. Planning permission was refused on the grounds that brownfield land should be developed before greenfield, in accordance with PPG3 para 32. The judge held that the SoS had misinterpreted para 32 which had to be read subject tothe para 34 guidance. The SoS appealed on the issue of the correct interpretation of para 32. "Held": appeal allowed on the grounds that it was for the decision maker in each individual case to attach the necessary weight to the para 34 consideration to provide sufficient housing land.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS66545 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 121648-1001

CA, 21 February 2003. Appeal by the SoS against the judge's decision to overturn the SoS's refusal of planning permission for a residential development on a greenfield site. Planning permission was refused on the grounds that brownfield land should be developed before greenfield, in accordance with PPG3 para 32. The judge held that the SoS had misinterpreted para 32 which had to be read subject tothe para 34 guidance. The SoS appealed on the issue of the correct interpretation of para 32. "Held": appeal allowed on the grounds that it was for the decision maker in each individual case to attach the necessary weight to the para 34 consideration to provide sufficient housing land.