Sage v SoS Environment and others
Series: Weekly Law Reports ; [2003] 1 WLR 983-994(12)Publication details: 2003Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2003] UKHL 22, 10 April 2003. Appeal by the local planning authority (Maidstone BC) from the CA decision ([2001] EWCA Civ 100, [2002] 1 P&CR 493) that an enforcement notice served on the respondent's partially erected dwelling house had expired. The issue was the whether the enforcement notice was served within the four-year time limit imposed in relation to the completion of building operations under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s171B. "Held": appeal allowed. The inspector was correct in concluding that since the building had not been 'substantially completed' the enforcement notice had been served within the four-year time limit. View judgment at www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X122098 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 122098-1001 |
[2003] UKHL 22, 10 April 2003. Appeal by the local planning authority (Maidstone BC) from the CA decision ([2001] EWCA Civ 100, [2002] 1 P&CR 493) that an enforcement notice served on the respondent's partially erected dwelling house had expired. The issue was the whether the enforcement notice was served within the four-year time limit imposed in relation to the completion of building operations under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s171B. "Held": appeal allowed. The inspector was correct in concluding that since the building had not been 'substantially completed' the enforcement notice had been served within the four-year time limit. View judgment at www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk.