Caledonian gap widens
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0328) 12 July 2003, 112(1)Publication details: 2003Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: Article discusses the north-south divide in the application of keep-open clauses in the case of "Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v Argyll Stores (Holdings) Ltd" (CA, Abs57165) and "Highland and Universal Properties Ltd v Safeway Properties Ltd" (CSIH, [2000] 3 EGLR 110). Article highlights that specific performance of a lease was the usual solution against tenants trading in Scotland, but not in England, although the Scottish Courts have set a new benchmark of 'exceptional' loss.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS66911 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 123216-1001 |
Article discusses the north-south divide in the application of keep-open clauses in the case of "Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v Argyll Stores (Holdings) Ltd" (CA, Abs57165) and "Highland and Universal Properties Ltd v Safeway Properties Ltd" (CSIH, [2000] 3 EGLR 110). Article highlights that specific performance of a lease was the usual solution against tenants trading in Scotland, but not in England, although the Scottish Courts have set a new benchmark of 'exceptional' loss.