Image from Google Jackets

The phoenix syndrome - the liability of directors

By: Series: Civil Engineering Surveyor ; July/August 2003, 21(1)Publication details: 2003Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: Looks at the phenomenon of the 'phoenix syndrome' where a limited liability company is put into liquidation to avoid its debts and then, almost immediately after, a new company is formed in the same business. It then continues trading in the same vein as the old. In "Archer Structures Ltd v Griffiths" ([2003] EWHC 957 (Ch), upreported) whilst one company was being wound up, an identical company was started with only a slight change of name by Mr Griffiths (G). A year later, Archer Structures (A) began a claim against the phoenix firm for unpaid debts. A won but G did not pay and the second company was also wound up. A claimed G was in breach of the Insolvency Act 1986, claiming M P J Contractors Ltd was a similar name to M P J Construction Ltd. G argued the two company names were not similar, which was rejected. G was ruled personally liable for the company debts. View judgment at www.bailii.org.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article ABS66864 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 123243-1001

Looks at the phenomenon of the 'phoenix syndrome' where a limited liability company is put into liquidation to avoid its debts and then, almost immediately after, a new company is formed in the same business. It then continues trading in the same vein as the old. In "Archer Structures Ltd v Griffiths" ([2003] EWHC 957 (Ch), upreported) whilst one company was being wound up, an identical company was started with only a slight change of name by Mr Griffiths (G). A year later, Archer Structures (A) began a claim against the phoenix firm for unpaid debts. A won but G did not pay and the second company was also wound up. A claimed G was in breach of the Insolvency Act 1986, claiming M P J Contractors Ltd was a similar name to M P J Construction Ltd. G argued the two company names were not similar, which was rejected. G was ruled personally liable for the company debts. View judgment at www.bailii.org.