Image from Google Jackets

Ivory Grove Ltd v Global Grange Ltd

Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [2003] 26 EG 179 (CS) (1) | Weekly Law Reports ; [2003] 1 WLR 2090-2108(19)Publication details: 2003Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2003] EWHC 1409 (Ch), 18 June 2003. Respondent landlord (G) refused tenant I's application for a new tenancy under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30(1)(f) on the basis that it was intending to carry out substantial building works to refurbish the premises in order to bring them up to a three or four crown standard in accordance with guidelines issued by the English Tourist Board. I claimed that the proposed works came within the category of general refurbishment and did not constitute demolition or reconstruction for the purposes of s30(1)(f) of the Act. County Court found for G. I appealed. HC upheld the County Court decision. View judgment at www.bailii.org. (See also "Marazzi and another v Global Grange Ltd" ([2003] EWHC 3010 (Ch), Abs66997) and Abs66828).
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS66998 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 123505-1001

[2003] EWHC 1409 (Ch), 18 June 2003. Respondent landlord (G) refused tenant I's application for a new tenancy under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30(1)(f) on the basis that it was intending to carry out substantial building works to refurbish the premises in order to bring them up to a three or four crown standard in accordance with guidelines issued by the English Tourist Board. I claimed that the proposed works came within the category of general refurbishment and did not constitute demolition or reconstruction for the purposes of s30(1)(f) of the Act. County Court found for G. I appealed. HC upheld the County Court decision. View judgment at www.bailii.org. (See also "Marazzi and another v Global Grange Ltd" ([2003] EWHC 3010 (Ch), Abs66997) and Abs66828).