Dunnett v Railtrack plc (in railway administration)
Series: All England Law Reports ; [2002] 2 All ER 850-853(4)Publication details: 2003Subject(s): Summary: [2002] EWCA Civ 303, 22 February 2002. Whilst claimant D was granted permission to appeal to the CA against the dismissal of her claim for damages against defendant R, she was recommended to consider the possibility of alternative dispute resolution in accordance with Civil Procedure Rules 1.4. D was willing to explore the possibility of settling the dispute by alternative dispute resolution, but R rejected the idea. R offered to pay D a sum to settle her claim which D rejected as she did not consider the sum offered to be reasonable or fair. D lost her appeal, R sought its costs referring to the offers it had made. Taking into account R's refusal to consider alternative dispute resolution, the CA gave no order as to costs. (See also Abs66423, X118533, X118601 and X118619)| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS67061 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 123509-1001 |
[2002] EWCA Civ 303, 22 February 2002. Whilst claimant D was granted permission to appeal to the CA against the dismissal of her claim for damages against defendant R, she was recommended to consider the possibility of alternative dispute resolution in accordance with Civil Procedure Rules 1.4. D was willing to explore the possibility of settling the dispute by alternative dispute resolution, but R rejected the idea. R offered to pay D a sum to settle her claim which D rejected as she did not consider the sum offered to be reasonable or fair. D lost her appeal, R sought its costs referring to the offers it had made. Taking into account R's refusal to consider alternative dispute resolution, the CA gave no order as to costs. (See also Abs66423, X118533, X118601 and X118619)