Judge each case on its individual merits
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0344) 1 November 2003, 166(1)Publication details: 2003Subject(s): Summary: Argues that care should be taken not to rely too much on case law to lay down concrete rules on the application of law. Asks what should happen when cases contradict each other as illustrated by "Marazzi and another v Global Grange Ltd" ([2003] EWHC 3010 (Ch), Abs66997) and "Ivory Grove Ltd v Global Grange Ltd" ([2003] EWHC 1407 (Ch), Abs66998). Each gave contradictory judgment upheld on appeal, as to whether works to upgrade hotel premises were sufficiently substantial to disentitle the tenants from having a new tenancy.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS67355 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 124541-1001 |
Argues that care should be taken not to rely too much on case law to lay down concrete rules on the application of law. Asks what should happen when cases contradict each other as illustrated by "Marazzi and another v Global Grange Ltd" ([2003] EWHC 3010 (Ch), Abs66997) and "Ivory Grove Ltd v Global Grange Ltd" ([2003] EWHC 1407 (Ch), Abs66998). Each gave contradictory judgment upheld on appeal, as to whether works to upgrade hotel premises were sufficiently substantial to disentitle the tenants from having a new tenancy.