Lloyd Jones and others v T-Mobile (UK) Ltd
Series: Estates Gazette Law Reports ; [2003] 49 EG 130, 130-135(6)Publication details: 2003Subject(s): Summary: [2003] EWCA Civ 1162, 31 July 2003. The defendent telecommunications company (T) had fixed a notice under the Telecommunications Act 1984 Sched 2 para 18, on their apparatus for potential objecters on completion of their tower to support mobile telephone antennae. The claimants (L) were adjacent property owners and occupiers who applied to have the tower removed under the Telecommunications Act 1984 para 17(2). At the preliminary trial, the judge decided that because the para 18 notice was not reasonably egible, the three month time limit had not begun to run. T appealed. "Held", the appeal was allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS67360 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 124653-1001 |
[2003] EWCA Civ 1162, 31 July 2003. The defendent telecommunications company (T) had fixed a notice under the Telecommunications Act 1984 Sched 2 para 18, on their apparatus for potential objecters on completion of their tower to support mobile telephone antennae. The claimants (L) were adjacent property owners and occupiers who applied to have the tower removed under the Telecommunications Act 1984 para 17(2). At the preliminary trial, the judge decided that because the para 18 notice was not reasonably egible, the three month time limit had not begun to run. T appealed. "Held", the appeal was allowed.