Service of notices and getting it right
Series: Commercial Leases ; 18(10) December 2004, 924-926(3)Publication details: 2004Subject(s):- NOTICES
- BOTTIN (INTERNATIONAL) INVESTMENTS LTD V VENSON GROUP PLC AND OTHERS
- LODGEPOWER LTD V TAYLOR AND OTHERS
- AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986
- AMERADA HESS AND OTHERS V ROME AND OTHERS
- AGRICULTURAL (MAINTENANCE REPAIR AND INSURANCE OF FIXED EQUIPMENT)
- EGERTON V RUTTER
- LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS68750 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 128783-1001 |
Examines the problem of serving the right notice at the right time and in the right manner in the management of let property. Concentrates on two cases, "Bottin (International) Investments Ltd v Venson Group Plc and others" ([2004] EWCA Civ 1368, unreported) and "Lodgepower Ltd v Taylor and others" ([2004] EWCA Civ 1367, Times 3 November 2004). The first case examined the issue of whether a notice had been satisfactorily served if it was left with a receptionist or security guard of the relevant company. The second discussed whether the notice had been validly given under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 s93.