Image from Google Jackets

Down to the ground

By: Series: Estates Gazette ; (0504) 29 January 2005, 165(1)Subject(s): Summary: Considers the importance of the grounds of possession, especially those relating to non-payment of rent by tenants who benefit from assured tenancies, in the light of the recent case "North British Housing Association Ltd v Matthews" ([2004] EWCA Civ 1736, Abs68751). This raised the issue as to whether a CC has the jurisdiction to adjourn a hearing of possession proceedings for non-payment of rent due to an authority's failure to pay housing benefit in time. Possession was sought on the basis that the circumstances fulfilled the mandatory ground for possession in the Housing Act 1988 Sched 2 Part I ground 8. Concludes that even in ground 8 proceedings the CC retains a general jurisdiction to adjourn a hearing prior to being satisfied that the landlord has made out the case for possession but such adjournments should only be made in exceptional circumstances.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article ABS68752 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 128826-1001

Considers the importance of the grounds of possession, especially those relating to non-payment of rent by tenants who benefit from assured tenancies, in the light of the recent case "North British Housing Association Ltd v Matthews" ([2004] EWCA Civ 1736, Abs68751). This raised the issue as to whether a CC has the jurisdiction to adjourn a hearing of possession proceedings for non-payment of rent due to an authority's failure to pay housing benefit in time. Possession was sought on the basis that the circumstances fulfilled the mandatory ground for possession in the Housing Act 1988 Sched 2 Part I ground 8. Concludes that even in ground 8 proceedings the CC retains a general jurisdiction to adjourn a hearing prior to being satisfied that the landlord has made out the case for possession but such adjournments should only be made in exceptional circumstances.